Reasoning · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Nano on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Claude Opus 4.5 Nano scores 69.4 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #281 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
69.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#281
of 600
Percentile
53th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
17.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Claude Opus 4.5 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Claude Opus 4.5 Nano sits at #281 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 17.6 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Claude Opus 4.5 Nano above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 77.3 on this benchmark. Claude Opus 4.5 Nano is 7.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Anthropic model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Claude Opus 4.5 Nano is 4.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.38 per million input tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Seed-OSS Chat ByteDance 65536 $3.49 74.4
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Mini Anthropic 32768 $11.43 76.5
Mixtral Turbo Together AI 65536 $3.20 72.4
Auto Max OpenRouter 8192 $8.41 71.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Nano Anthropic 32768 $9.38 73.3
Gemini 3 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 8192 $9.11 73.2
Nemotron 4 Chat NVIDIA 65536 $3.99 75.0

Other benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 76.1 300 50th
SWE-bench Verified 62.2 273 55th
HumanEval 75.5 334 44th
MATH-500 77.2 272 55th
AIME 2025 71.4 229 62th
LiveCodeBench 65.0 293 51th
IFEval 79.7 337 44th
TruthfulQA 78.1 252 58th
HellaSwag 82.1 344 43th
MMMU 69.2 322 46th
Arena Elo 1373.3 305 49th

FAQ

What score does Claude Opus 4.5 Nano get on GPQA Diamond?

Claude Opus 4.5 Nano scores 69.4 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 Nano rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #281 of 600 models, in the 53rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Nano good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Opus 4.5 Nano cost?

Claude Opus 4.5 Nano costs $9.38 per million input tokens and $36.06 per million output tokens.

Related