Mathematics · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro scores 91.4 on AIME 2025, placing it #1 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
91.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#1
of 600
Percentile
100th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
0.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Claude Opus 4.5 Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro sits at #1 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 0.0 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Claude Opus 4.5 Pro above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 79.7 on this benchmark. Claude Opus 4.5 Pro is 11.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among frontier models, the average is 84.9. Claude Opus 4.5 Pro is 6.5 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 91.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $20.98 per million input tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

Other benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 91.2 3 100th
GPQA Diamond 86.0 3 100th
SWE-bench Verified 81.1 2 100th
HumanEval 93.4 7 99th
MATH-500 91.2 36 94th
LiveCodeBench 84.1 9 99th
IFEval 96.1 1 100th
TruthfulQA 86.7 41 93th
HellaSwag 95.2 4 99th
MMMU 83.3 16 97th
Arena Elo 1483.9 19 97th

FAQ

What score does Claude Opus 4.5 Pro get on AIME 2025?

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro scores 91.4 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 Pro rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #1 of 600 models, in the 100th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Opus 4.5 Pro cost?

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro costs $20.98 per million input tokens and $85.59 per million output tokens.

Related