Safety · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning scores 89.0 on TruthfulQA, placing it #11 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
89.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#11
of 600
Percentile
98th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
2.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning sits at #11 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 2.1 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 82.9 on this benchmark. Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning is 6.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among frontier models, the average is 86.9. Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning is 2.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 89.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $20.91 per million input tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
Gemini 3 Pro Google DeepMind 2000000 $18.24 86.1

Other benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 90.7 4 99th
GPQA Diamond 82.6 22 96th
SWE-bench Verified 79.5 10 98th
HumanEval 92.1 19 97th
MATH-500 91.6 30 95th
AIME 2025 88.9 10 98th
LiveCodeBench 81.8 27 96th
IFEval 95.9 2 100th
HellaSwag 93.8 14 98th
MMMU 84.6 7 99th
Arena Elo 1497.5 4 99th

FAQ

What score does Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning get on TruthfulQA?

Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning scores 89.0 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #11 of 600 models, in the 98th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning cost?

Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning costs $20.91 per million input tokens and $108.13 per million output tokens.

Related