Knowledge · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Claude Opus 4.5 scores 87.0 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #33 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
87.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#33
of 600
Percentile
95th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
4.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Claude Opus 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Claude Opus 4.5 sits at #33 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 4.6 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Claude Opus 4.5 above the midpoint.

Anthropic models average 83.4 on this benchmark. Claude Opus 4.5 is 3.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Anthropic model.

Among frontier models, the average is 86.9. Claude Opus 4.5 is 0.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 87.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $19.42 per million input tokens, Claude Opus 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 3 Pro Vision Google DeepMind 200000 $17.59 85.5
Grok 3 Max xAI 2000000 $17.66 85.9
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 1000000 $18.37 85.9
Gemini 3 Flash Reasoning Google DeepMind 128000 $17.05 83.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
Gemini 3 Flash Pro Google DeepMind 400000 $17.71 84.8

Other benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 81.7 34 94th
SWE-bench Verified 77.1 22 96th
HumanEval 93.7 5 99th
MATH-500 93.7 8 99th
AIME 2025 89.8 7 99th
LiveCodeBench 85.0 3 100th
IFEval 92.5 29 95th
TruthfulQA 88.1 20 97th
HellaSwag 92.4 35 94th
MMMU 84.2 12 98th
Arena Elo 1491.2 8 99th

FAQ

What score does Claude Opus 4.5 get on MMLU-Pro?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores 87.0 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #33 of 600 models, in the 95th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Claude Opus 4.5 cost?

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens.

Related