Knowledge · Mistral AI

Codestral on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

Codestral scores 79.2 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #203 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
79.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#203
of 600
Percentile
66th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
12.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Codestral highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, Codestral sits at #203 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 12.4 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Codestral above the midpoint.

Mistral AI models average 71.4 on this benchmark. Codestral is 7.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Mistral AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.0. Codestral is 0.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.19 per million input tokens, Codestral is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemini 3 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $12.27 78.1
Gemma 3 Chat Google DeepMind 65536 $3.74 74.5
Qwen3-Coder Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.59 78.4
Sonar Pro Pro Perplexity 200000 $13.59 79.7
Codestral Mistral AI 65536 $4.19 77.6
Llama 4 Scout Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.66 78.0
GPT-5.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $12.19 77.7

Other benchmarks for Codestral

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 75.3 138 77th
SWE-bench Verified 67.7 152 75th
HumanEval 80.5 218 64th
MATH-500 82.1 161 73th
AIME 2025 71.4 230 62th
LiveCodeBench 67.3 241 60th
IFEval 85.9 160 73th
TruthfulQA 79.9 179 70th
HellaSwag 88.2 132 78th
MMMU 76.0 139 77th
Arena Elo 1391.6 242 60th

FAQ

What score does Codestral get on MMLU-Pro?

Codestral scores 79.2 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does Codestral rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #203 of 600 models, in the 66th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is Codestral good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Codestral cost?

Codestral costs $4.19 per million input tokens and $16.36 per million output tokens.

Related