Coding · Cohere

Command A Max on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Command A Max scores 69.7 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #116 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
69.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#116
of 600
Percentile
81th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
12.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Command A Max highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Command A Max sits at #116 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 12.0 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Command A Max above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 56.0 on this benchmark. Command A Max is 13.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 66.4. Command A Max is 3.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $14.28 per million input tokens, Command A Max is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
MiniMax-M2 MiniMax 200000 $5.19 80.6
MiniMax-M2 Instruct MiniMax 128000 $5.11 79.4
ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning Baidu 1000000 $14.36 79.8
Magistral Instruct Mistral AI 65536 $4.48 78.4
Command A Max Cohere 400000 $14.28 79.9
Doubao 1.5 Pro Reasoning ByteDance 128000 $14.56 81.6
Sonar Pro Pro Perplexity 200000 $13.59 79.7

Other benchmarks for Command A Max

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 84.3 73 88th
GPQA Diamond 74.5 153 75th
HumanEval 83.4 147 76th
MATH-500 85.7 97 84th
AIME 2025 77.2 126 79th
LiveCodeBench 73.1 124 79th
IFEval 86.7 140 77th
TruthfulQA 82.2 125 79th
HellaSwag 87.1 171 72th
MMMU 74.6 166 72th
Arena Elo 1443.7 91 85th

FAQ

What score does Command A Max get on SWE-bench Verified?

Command A Max scores 69.7 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Command A Max rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #116 of 600 models, in the 81st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Command A Max good at SWE-bench Verified?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command A Max cost?

Command A Max costs $14.28 per million input tokens and $70.22 per million output tokens.

Related