Coding · Cohere

Command A Nano on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Command A Nano scores 54.9 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #409 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
54.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#409
of 600
Percentile
32th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
30.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Command A Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Command A Nano sits at #409 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 30.2 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Command A Nano below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 58.9 on this benchmark. Command A Nano is 4.0 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Command A Nano is 3.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 54.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.90 per million input tokens, Command A Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Embed 4 Turbo Cohere 4096 $5.13 64.0
Kimi K2 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.86 64.7
Nova Lite Mini Amazon 16384 $5.43 65.0
SmolLM3 Chat Hugging Face 16384 $1.61 62.1
Command A Nano Cohere 8192 $5.90 66.3
Nemotron Nano Chat NVIDIA 32768 $2.21 66.2
Embed 4 Cohere 32768 $4.79 63.8

Other benchmarks for Command A Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 69.8 397 34th
GPQA Diamond 61.4 394 34th
SWE-bench Verified 54.5 387 36th
HumanEval 71.2 385 36th
MATH-500 68.8 390 35th
AIME 2025 57.7 403 33th
IFEval 76.9 378 37th
TruthfulQA 71.5 388 35th
HellaSwag 77.1 414 31th
MMMU 65.1 380 37th
Arena Elo 1323.3 395 34th

FAQ

What score does Command A Nano get on LiveCodeBench?

Command A Nano scores 54.9 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Command A Nano rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #409 of 600 models, in the 32nd percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Command A Nano good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command A Nano cost?

Command A Nano costs $5.90 per million input tokens and $25.76 per million output tokens.

Related