Mathematics · Cohere

Command A Pro on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Command A Pro scores 83.1 on MATH-500, placing it #144 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
83.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#144
of 600
Percentile
76th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
13.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Command A Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Command A Pro sits at #144 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 13.6 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Command A Pro above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 70.8 on this benchmark. Command A Pro is 12.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 81.3. Command A Pro is 1.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $14.28 per million input tokens, Command A Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mistral Large 3 Instruct Mistral AI 400000 $5.31 81.1
Hunyuan-Large Chat Tencent 200000 $4.35 78.1
Llama 4 Maverick Base Meta AI 128000 $4.68 79.1
Sonar Max Perplexity 32768 $11.60 77.8
Command A Pro Cohere 200000 $14.28 81.3
Hunyuan-Large Tencent 65536 $4.33 78.2
Hunyuan-Turbo Pro Tencent 65536 $12.00 77.6

Other benchmarks for Command A Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.3 138 77th
GPQA Diamond 79.1 70 88th
SWE-bench Verified 71.2 90 85th
HumanEval 87.5 78 87th
AIME 2025 78.2 112 81th
LiveCodeBench 74.0 109 82th
IFEval 89.0 82 86th
TruthfulQA 83.3 101 83th
HellaSwag 90.1 84 86th
MMMU 77.2 111 82th
Arena Elo 1434.6 108 82th

FAQ

What score does Command A Pro get on MATH-500?

Command A Pro scores 83.1 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Command A Pro rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #144 of 600 models, in the 76th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Command A Pro good at MATH-500?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command A Pro cost?

Command A Pro costs $14.28 per million input tokens and $68.05 per million output tokens.

Related