Reasoning · Cohere

Command A Reasoning on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

Command A Reasoning scores 76.3 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #112 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
76.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#112
of 600
Percentile
81th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
10.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with Command A Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, Command A Reasoning sits at #112 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 10.7 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts Command A Reasoning above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 63.7 on this benchmark. Command A Reasoning is 12.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. Command A Reasoning is 2.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.74 per million input tokens, Command A Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
QwQ Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.57 78.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $15.20 81.6
ERNIE 4.0 Max Baidu 32768 $12.40 78.9
ERNIE 4.5 Max Baidu 128000 $14.41 80.6
Command A Reasoning Cohere 400000 $13.74 80.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Mini Anthropic 65536 $12.72 79.0
DeepSeek-R1 Base DeepSeek 400000 $5.05 80.1

Other benchmarks for Command A Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.2 178 70th
SWE-bench Verified 71.1 94 84th
HumanEval 83.6 141 77th
MATH-500 85.2 105 83th
AIME 2025 74.2 171 72th
LiveCodeBench 74.1 107 82th
IFEval 87.8 106 82th
TruthfulQA 83.4 95 84th
HellaSwag 87.6 157 74th
MMMU 78.2 90 85th
Arena Elo 1435.9 106 82th

FAQ

What score does Command A Reasoning get on GPQA Diamond?

Command A Reasoning scores 76.3 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does Command A Reasoning rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #112 of 600 models, in the 81st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is Command A Reasoning good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command A Reasoning cost?

Command A Reasoning costs $13.74 per million input tokens and $51.49 per million output tokens.

Related