Command R+ 1.5B on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means
Command R+ 1.5B scores 56.4 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #565 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with Command R+ 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $20.50 | 87.9 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 2000000 | $20.91 | 88.2 |
| 5 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.69 | 87.5 |
| 6 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.71 | 88.0 |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 1000000 | $20.90 | 87.8 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Vision | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.03 | 87.4 |
| 10 | Gemini 3 Pro Max | Google DeepMind | 2000000 | $20.57 | 87.9 |
What this score means
On MMLU-Pro, Command R+ 1.5B sits at #565 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 35.2 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts Command R+ 1.5B below the midpoint.
Cohere models average 72.3 on this benchmark. Command R+ 1.5B is 15.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.
Among small open-weight models, the average is 59.8. Command R+ 1.5B is 3.4 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 56.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $0.51 per million input tokens, Command R+ 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron Nano 7B | NVIDIA | 8192 | $0.35 | 47.5 |
| Hunyuan-Large 1.5B | Tencent | 8192 | $0.54 | 50.5 |
| Llama 3 Baseten 1.5B | Baseten | 4096 | $0.42 | 48.2 |
| Llama 3 Novita 1.5B | Novita AI | 4096 | $0.41 | 49.1 |
| Command R+ 1.5B | Cohere | 32768 | $0.51 | 50.0 |
| Mistral Small 3 1.5B | Mistral AI | 32768 | $0.42 | 49.2 |
| Llama 3 Anyscale 1.5B | Anyscale | 16384 | $0.43 | 48.9 |
Other benchmarks for Command R+ 1.5B
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.1 | 571 | 5th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 34.5 | 562 | 6th | |
| HumanEval | 52.9 | 556 | 7th | |
| MATH-500 | 52.0 | 539 | 10th | |
| AIME 2025 | 35.1 | 568 | 5th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 35.8 | 562 | 6th | |
| IFEval | 64.0 | 539 | 10th | |
| TruthfulQA | 56.8 | 553 | 8th | |
| HellaSwag | 67.0 | 561 | 7th | |
| MMMU | 51.7 | 535 | 11th | |
| Arena Elo | 1193.9 | 560 | 7th |
FAQ
What score does Command R+ 1.5B get on MMLU-Pro?
Command R+ 1.5B scores 56.4 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.
How does Command R+ 1.5B rank on MMLU-Pro?
It ranks #565 of 600 models, in the 6th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.
Is Command R+ 1.5B good at MMLU-Pro?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?
MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Command R+ 1.5B cost?
Command R+ 1.5B costs $0.51 per million input tokens and $2.35 per million output tokens.