Commonsense · Cohere

Command R+ Chat on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means

Command R+ Chat scores 84.9 on HellaSwag, placing it #249 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Score
84.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#249
of 600
Percentile
59th
within the index
Benchmark avg
81.4
all models
Leader
96.1
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
11.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with Command R+ Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.1
GPT-5.2 Turbo 95.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 95.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 95.2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 95.2
Grok 4 Reasoning 95.2
GPT-5.2 Vision 94.6
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 94.6
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 94.4
o4 Pro 94.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
3 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
8 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
9 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
10 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3

What this score means

On HellaSwag, Command R+ Chat sits at #249 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 11.2 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts Command R+ Chat above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 79.9 on this benchmark. Command R+ Chat is 5.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 86.8. Command R+ Chat is 1.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 84.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.02 per million input tokens, Command R+ Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
Mistral Small 3 Instruct Mistral AI 32768 $3.97 75.1
Mixtral Groq Groq 16384 $3.37 73.1
Nova Lite Turbo Amazon 8192 $9.14 73.2
Command R+ Chat Cohere 32768 $4.02 76.0
GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI 128000 $10.43 74.3
Grok 4 Nano xAI 16384 $8.97 72.7

Other benchmarks for Command R+ Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.9 149 75th
GPQA Diamond 70.0 261 57th
SWE-bench Verified 66.7 175 71th
HumanEval 82.5 172 71th
MATH-500 76.7 287 52th
AIME 2025 72.3 210 65th
LiveCodeBench 71.1 167 72th
IFEval 82.0 277 54th
TruthfulQA 79.5 200 67th
MMMU 69.8 309 49th
Arena Elo 1401.9 204 66th

FAQ

What score does Command R+ Chat get on HellaSwag?

Command R+ Chat scores 84.9 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.

How does Command R+ Chat rank on HellaSwag?

It ranks #249 of 600 models, in the 59th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.

Is Command R+ Chat good at HellaSwag?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HellaSwag score calculated?

HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command R+ Chat cost?

Command R+ Chat costs $4.02 per million input tokens and $15.33 per million output tokens.

Related