Coding · Cohere

Command R+ Instruct on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

Command R+ Instruct scores 67.5 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #155 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
67.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#155
of 600
Percentile
74th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
14.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with Command R+ Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, Command R+ Instruct sits at #155 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 14.2 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts Command R+ Instruct above the midpoint.

Cohere models average 56.0 on this benchmark. Command R+ Instruct is 11.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Cohere model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 66.4. Command R+ Instruct is 1.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 67.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.16 per million input tokens, Command R+ Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K1.5 Instruct Moonshot AI 200000 $5.15 80.5
Codestral Mistral AI 65536 $4.19 77.6
Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo ByteDance 128000 $13.81 79.4
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Command R+ Instruct Cohere 200000 $4.16 76.2
ERNIE 4.5 Turbo Baidu 128000 $13.75 79.7
GLM-4.6 Zhipu AI 128000 $5.10 80.2

Other benchmarks for Command R+ Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.8 187 69th
GPQA Diamond 70.5 250 58th
HumanEval 81.2 208 65th
MATH-500 82.2 159 74th
AIME 2025 69.3 271 55th
LiveCodeBench 67.6 233 61th
IFEval 85.5 172 71th
TruthfulQA 78.3 243 60th
HellaSwag 84.8 254 58th
MMMU 71.8 249 59th
Arena Elo 1395.7 223 63th

FAQ

What score does Command R+ Instruct get on SWE-bench Verified?

Command R+ Instruct scores 67.5 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does Command R+ Instruct rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #155 of 600 models, in the 74th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is Command R+ Instruct good at SWE-bench Verified?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Command R+ Instruct cost?

Command R+ Instruct costs $4.16 per million input tokens and $17.58 per million output tokens.

Related