Knowledge · DeepSeek

DeepSeek-Coder Base on MMLU-Pro: score, rank and what it means

DeepSeek-Coder Base scores 78.9 on MMLU-Pro, placing it #211 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Score
78.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#211
of 600
Percentile
65th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.5
all models
Leader
91.6
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
12.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMLU-Pro, with DeepSeek-Coder Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 91.6
GPT-5.1 Max 91.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.2
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 90.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.1
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.5
GPT-5.2 Vision 89.5
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
6 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
7 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On MMLU-Pro, DeepSeek-Coder Base sits at #211 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 91.6, so the gap to the top is 12.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.1, which puts DeepSeek-Coder Base above the midpoint.

DeepSeek models average 74.9 on this benchmark. DeepSeek-Coder Base is 4.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average DeepSeek model.

Among coding models, the average is 72.5. DeepSeek-Coder Base is 6.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $3.53 per million input tokens, DeepSeek-Coder Base is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMLU-Pro. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Perplexity 200000 $10.57 76.0
ERNIE 4.0 Baidu 32768 $11.37 76.7
Hunyuan-Large Instruct Tencent 65536 $4.39 78.2
Command R+ Cohere 32768 $3.96 76.3
DeepSeek-Coder Base DeepSeek 32768 $3.53 74.1
Llama 3 Hyperbolic Instruct Hyperbolic 200000 $3.79 76.2
MiniMax-Text MiniMax 32768 $4.44 77.0

Other benchmarks for DeepSeek-Coder Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
GPQA Diamond 70.8 240 60th
SWE-bench Verified 59.3 337 44th
HumanEval 78.4 283 53th
MATH-500 74.2 341 43th
AIME 2025 71.7 223 63th
LiveCodeBench 67.3 242 60th
IFEval 81.6 282 53th
TruthfulQA 79.0 215 64th
HellaSwag 84.8 255 58th
MMMU 69.0 325 46th
Arena Elo 1388.5 255 58th

FAQ

What score does DeepSeek-Coder Base get on MMLU-Pro?

DeepSeek-Coder Base scores 78.9 on MMLU-Pro in this index. The benchmark average is 73.5 and the top score is 91.6.

How does DeepSeek-Coder Base rank on MMLU-Pro?

It ranks #211 of 600 models, in the 65th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 91.6.

Is DeepSeek-Coder Base good at MMLU-Pro?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMLU-Pro score calculated?

MMLU-Pro is a knowledge benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does DeepSeek-Coder Base cost?

DeepSeek-Coder Base costs $3.53 per million input tokens and $12.53 per million output tokens.

Related