Mathematics · DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 1.5B on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

DeepSeek-R1 1.5B scores 42.7 on AIME 2025, placing it #527 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
42.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#527
of 600
Percentile
12th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
48.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with DeepSeek-R1 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, DeepSeek-R1 1.5B sits at #527 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 48.7 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts DeepSeek-R1 1.5B below the midpoint.

DeepSeek models average 65.1 on this benchmark. DeepSeek-R1 1.5B is 22.4 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average DeepSeek model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 41.6. DeepSeek-R1 1.5B is 1.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 42.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.04 per million input tokens, DeepSeek-R1 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 1.5B Zhipu AI 4096 $0.92 54.7
Llama 3 Baseten 7B Baseten 32768 $0.87 55.3
Codestral 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.05 57.0
Mixtral Turbo 8B Together AI 4096 $0.75 54.1
DeepSeek-R1 1.5B DeepSeek 16384 $1.04 56.6
Llama 3 Lambda 7B Lambda 8192 $0.84 55.4
Llama 3 Replicate 8B Replicate 32768 $1.00 57.0

Other benchmarks for DeepSeek-R1 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 60.7 518 14th
GPQA Diamond 54.3 475 21th
SWE-bench Verified 45.2 464 23th
HumanEval 59.7 508 15th
MATH-500 58.5 484 19th
LiveCodeBench 42.9 516 14th
IFEval 66.6 506 16th
TruthfulQA 61.4 514 14th
HellaSwag 74.2 452 25th
MMMU 56.2 484 19th
Arena Elo 1250.5 490 18th

FAQ

What score does DeepSeek-R1 1.5B get on AIME 2025?

DeepSeek-R1 1.5B scores 42.7 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does DeepSeek-R1 1.5B rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #527 of 600 models, in the 12th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is DeepSeek-R1 1.5B good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does DeepSeek-R1 1.5B cost?

DeepSeek-R1 1.5B costs $1.04 per million input tokens and $5.02 per million output tokens.

Related