Mathematics · DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 7B on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

DeepSeek-R1 7B scores 64.0 on MATH-500, placing it #424 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
64.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#424
of 600
Percentile
29th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
32.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with DeepSeek-R1 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, DeepSeek-R1 7B sits at #424 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 32.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts DeepSeek-R1 7B below the midpoint.

DeepSeek models average 74.2 on this benchmark. DeepSeek-R1 7B is 10.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average DeepSeek model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 53.7. DeepSeek-R1 7B is 10.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.79 per million input tokens, DeepSeek-R1 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Embed 4 Max Cohere 8192 $5.68 66.1
Kimi K2 7B Moonshot AI 16384 $1.72 62.7
GLM-4.5 8B Zhipu AI 32768 $1.46 61.3
Llama 4 Maverick 8B Meta AI 4096 $1.64 63.4
DeepSeek-R1 7B DeepSeek 32768 $1.79 63.0
GPT-NeoX EleutherAI 16384 $1.57 61.7
StableLM 2 Base Stability AI 8192 $1.49 61.9

Other benchmarks for DeepSeek-R1 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 69.4 402 33th
GPQA Diamond 57.7 431 28th
SWE-bench Verified 53.1 397 34th
HumanEval 65.3 437 27th
AIME 2025 53.0 434 28th
LiveCodeBench 52.2 425 29th
IFEval 71.7 434 28th
TruthfulQA 67.5 423 30th
HellaSwag 77.3 411 32th
MMMU 61.8 410 32th
Arena Elo 1297.5 424 29th

FAQ

What score does DeepSeek-R1 7B get on MATH-500?

DeepSeek-R1 7B scores 64.0 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does DeepSeek-R1 7B rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #424 of 600 models, in the 29th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is DeepSeek-R1 7B good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does DeepSeek-R1 7B cost?

DeepSeek-R1 7B costs $1.79 per million input tokens and $9.81 per million output tokens.

Related