Multimodal · DeepSeek

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat scores 76.0 on MMMU, placing it #140 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
76.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#140
of 600
Percentile
77th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
10.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat sits at #140 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 10.9 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat above the midpoint.

DeepSeek models average 68.9 on this benchmark. DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is 7.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average DeepSeek model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is 1.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 76.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.80 per million input tokens, DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nemotron 4 NVIDIA 65536 $4.18 76.6
Sonar Pro Reasoning Perplexity 128000 $13.94 80.5
Yi-Lightning 01.AI 32768 $4.22 77.2
Codestral Mistral AI 65536 $4.19 77.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat DeepSeek 1000000 $5.80 82.5
Qwen3 Base Alibaba Cloud 65536 $4.33 77.4
Mistral Large 3 Base Mistral AI 65536 $4.47 78.2

Other benchmarks for DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 82.5 114 81th
GPQA Diamond 78.0 85 86th
SWE-bench Verified 69.6 120 80th
HumanEval 87.9 74 88th
MATH-500 90.2 46 92th
AIME 2025 81.0 75 88th
LiveCodeBench 77.9 65 89th
IFEval 88.6 91 85th
TruthfulQA 86.3 45 93th
HellaSwag 89.2 107 82th
Arena Elo 1462.2 48 92th

FAQ

What score does DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat get on MMMU?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat scores 76.0 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat rank on MMMU?

It ranks #140 of 600 models, in the 77th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat cost?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat costs $5.80 per million input tokens and $26.43 per million output tokens.

Related