Embed 4 Nano on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Embed 4 Nano scores 55.2 on HumanEval, placing it #540 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Embed 4 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Embed 4 Nano sits at #540 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 41.6 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Embed 4 Nano below the midpoint.
Cohere models average 72.5 on this benchmark. Embed 4 Nano is 17.3 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.
Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Embed 4 Nano is 16.3 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 55.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $1.48 per million input tokens, Embed 4 Nano is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLMo 2 7B | Allen Institute for AI | 16384 | $0.56 | 51.7 |
| Arctic 8B | Snowflake | 8192 | $0.65 | 52.4 |
| Llama 4 Scout 1.5B | Meta AI | 8192 | $0.66 | 53.0 |
| Phi-3.5 8B | Microsoft | 16384 | $0.59 | 51.2 |
| Embed 4 Nano | Cohere | 8192 | $1.48 | 49.7 |
| Kimi K1.5 1.5B | Moonshot AI | 4096 | $0.75 | 53.2 |
| Mixtral Turbo 7B | Together AI | 8192 | $0.68 | 53.2 |
Other benchmarks for Embed 4 Nano
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 54.5 | 575 | 4th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 45.6 | 560 | 7th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 33.1 | 571 | 5th | |
| MATH-500 | 52.4 | 537 | 11th | |
| AIME 2025 | 33.5 | 575 | 4th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 40.3 | 535 | 11th | |
| IFEval | 61.0 | 564 | 6th | |
| TruthfulQA | 55.6 | 570 | 5th | |
| HellaSwag | 69.8 | 537 | 11th | |
| MMMU | 46.2 | 578 | 4th | |
| Arena Elo | 1207.9 | 547 | 9th |
FAQ
What score does Embed 4 Nano get on HumanEval?
Embed 4 Nano scores 55.2 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Embed 4 Nano rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #540 of 600 models, in the 10th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Embed 4 Nano good at HumanEval?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Embed 4 Nano cost?
Embed 4 Nano costs $1.48 per million input tokens and $6.14 per million output tokens.