Embed 4 Reasoning on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means
Embed 4 Reasoning scores 68.9 on HumanEval, placing it #409 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Embed 4 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 2 | Gemini 3 Pro Pro | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $19.80 | 87.3 |
| 3 | o4 Max | OpenAI | 2000000 | $19.51 | 86.2 |
| 4 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.42 | 87.7 |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 8 | Grok 4 Max | xAI | 2000000 | $19.70 | 86.6 |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 10 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
What this score means
On HumanEval, Embed 4 Reasoning sits at #409 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 27.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Embed 4 Reasoning below the midpoint.
Cohere models average 72.5 on this benchmark. Embed 4 Reasoning is 3.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.
Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Embed 4 Reasoning is 2.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 68.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $5.50 per million input tokens, Embed 4 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERNIE 4.5 Nano | Baidu | 32768 | $6.01 | 65.6 |
| Embed 4 | Cohere | 32768 | $4.79 | 63.8 |
| Firefunction Mini | Fireworks AI | 32768 | $4.63 | 63.2 |
| SmolLM3 Instruct | Hugging Face | 8192 | $1.69 | 63.6 |
| Embed 4 Reasoning | Cohere | 4096 | $5.50 | 65.3 |
| Nova Pro Nano | Amazon | 8192 | $5.44 | 65.4 |
| Doubao 1.5 Pro Nano | ByteDance | 16384 | $5.78 | 66.6 |
Other benchmarks for Embed 4 Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 70.1 | 395 | 34th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 62.8 | 385 | 36th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 49.2 | 427 | 29th | |
| MATH-500 | 67.1 | 406 | 32th | |
| AIME 2025 | 57.9 | 400 | 33th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 56.1 | 396 | 34th | |
| IFEval | 76.0 | 389 | 35th | |
| TruthfulQA | 70.4 | 396 | 34th | |
| HellaSwag | 76.5 | 420 | 30th | |
| MMMU | 62.8 | 400 | 33th | |
| Arena Elo | 1310.3 | 408 | 32th |
FAQ
What score does Embed 4 Reasoning get on HumanEval?
Embed 4 Reasoning scores 68.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.
How does Embed 4 Reasoning rank on HumanEval?
It ranks #409 of 600 models, in the 32nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.
Is Embed 4 Reasoning good at HumanEval?
It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HumanEval score calculated?
HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does Embed 4 Reasoning cost?
Embed 4 Reasoning costs $5.50 per million input tokens and $26.10 per million output tokens.