Coding · Cohere

Embed 4 on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Embed 4 scores 69.3 on HumanEval, placing it #406 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
69.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#406
of 600
Percentile
32th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
27.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Embed 4 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Embed 4 sits at #406 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 27.5 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Embed 4 below the midpoint.

Cohere models average 72.5 on this benchmark. Embed 4 is 3.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Cohere model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Embed 4 is 2.2 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.79 per million input tokens, Embed 4 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Pro Nano Perplexity 32768 $5.50 66.1
SmolLM3 Hugging Face 8192 $1.71 63.1
StableLM 2 Instruct Stability AI 16384 $1.93 65.2
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Embed 4 Cohere 32768 $4.79 63.8
Firefunction Mini Fireworks AI 32768 $4.63 63.2
SmolLM3 Instruct Hugging Face 8192 $1.69 63.6

Other benchmarks for Embed 4

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 67.9 419 30th
GPQA Diamond 61.6 393 35th
SWE-bench Verified 51.7 408 32th
MATH-500 66.0 412 31th
AIME 2025 54.1 422 30th
LiveCodeBench 54.3 411 32th
IFEval 73.5 410 32th
TruthfulQA 69.9 401 33th
HellaSwag 75.3 436 27th
MMMU 58.2 455 24th
Arena Elo 1286.4 437 27th

FAQ

What score does Embed 4 get on HumanEval?

Embed 4 scores 69.3 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Embed 4 rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #406 of 600 models, in the 32nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Embed 4 good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Embed 4 cost?

Embed 4 costs $4.79 per million input tokens and $20.86 per million output tokens.

Related