Coding · Baidu

ERNIE 4.0 Max on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.0 Max scores 83.5 on HumanEval, placing it #142 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
83.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#142
of 600
Percentile
76th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
13.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with ERNIE 4.0 Max highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, ERNIE 4.0 Max sits at #142 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 13.3 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts ERNIE 4.0 Max above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 80.6 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.0 Max is 2.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. ERNIE 4.0 Max is 1.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $12.40 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.0 Max is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GLM-4.6 Zhipu AI 128000 $5.10 80.2
GLM-4.6 Base Zhipu AI 128000 $4.53 78.5
Nova Pro Amazon 32768 $12.75 79.4
Command A Reasoning Cohere 400000 $13.74 80.2
ERNIE 4.0 Max Baidu 32768 $12.40 78.9
Gemini 3 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $12.27 78.1
Grok 4 Mini xAI 65536 $12.21 77.9

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.0 Max

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.8 152 75th
GPQA Diamond 76.4 110 82th
SWE-bench Verified 68.0 145 76th
MATH-500 84.6 115 81th
AIME 2025 76.5 135 78th
LiveCodeBench 70.1 188 69th
IFEval 85.9 161 73th
TruthfulQA 81.6 138 77th
HellaSwag 88.7 120 80th
MMMU 72.0 242 60th
Arena Elo 1405.1 194 68th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.0 Max get on HumanEval?

ERNIE 4.0 Max scores 83.5 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does ERNIE 4.0 Max rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #142 of 600 models, in the 76th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is ERNIE 4.0 Max good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.0 Max cost?

ERNIE 4.0 Max costs $12.40 per million input tokens and $53.07 per million output tokens.

Related