Coding · Baidu

ERNIE 4.0 Nano on SWE-bench Verified: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.0 Nano scores 47.0 on SWE-bench Verified, placing it #446 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Score
47.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#446
of 600
Percentile
26th
within the index
Benchmark avg
57.5
all models
Leader
81.7
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
34.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on SWE-bench Verified, with ERNIE 4.0 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 81.7
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 81.1
GPT-5.2 Max 80.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 80.2
GPT-5.2 80.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 80.1
o4 Max 79.8
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 79.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 79.5
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 79.5

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
3 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
7 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On SWE-bench Verified, ERNIE 4.0 Nano sits at #446 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 81.7, so the gap to the top is 34.7 points. The median model in this index scores 61.0, which puts ERNIE 4.0 Nano below the midpoint.

Baidu models average 63.6 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.0 Nano is 16.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Baidu model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 54.9. ERNIE 4.0 Nano is 7.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.68 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.0 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on SWE-bench Verified. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
SmolLM3 Chat Hugging Face 16384 $1.61 62.1
QwQ 8B Alibaba Cloud 16384 $1.37 59.5
SmolLM3 Hugging Face 8192 $1.71 63.1
Pythia Instruct EleutherAI 8192 $1.41 60.8
ERNIE 4.0 Nano Baidu 32768 $4.68 62.1
Llama 3.3 Groq 8B Groq 16384 $1.17 59.5
Magistral 7B Mistral AI 32768 $1.22 58.9

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.0 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.6 442 26th
GPQA Diamond 57.1 439 27th
HumanEval 67.0 422 30th
MATH-500 63.4 431 28th
AIME 2025 53.8 426 29th
LiveCodeBench 53.3 415 31th
IFEval 71.2 438 27th
TruthfulQA 68.3 410 32th
HellaSwag 74.8 444 26th
MMMU 61.6 414 31th
Arena Elo 1288.3 432 28th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.0 Nano get on SWE-bench Verified?

ERNIE 4.0 Nano scores 47.0 on SWE-bench Verified in this index. The benchmark average is 57.5 and the top score is 81.7.

How does ERNIE 4.0 Nano rank on SWE-bench Verified?

It ranks #446 of 600 models, in the 26th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 81.7.

Is ERNIE 4.0 Nano good at SWE-bench Verified?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the SWE-bench Verified score calculated?

SWE-bench Verified is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.0 Nano cost?

ERNIE 4.0 Nano costs $4.68 per million input tokens and $22.77 per million output tokens.

Related