Mathematics · Baidu

ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning scores 77.2 on AIME 2025, placing it #127 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
77.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#127
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
14.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning sits at #127 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 14.2 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 71.5 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning is 5.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.9. ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning is 3.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 77.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $12.20 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Hunyuan-Turbo Reasoning Tencent 128000 $11.89 77.5
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot AI 1000000 $5.80 82.3
Llama 4 Scout Instruct Meta AI 32768 $4.59 79.1
Command A Max Cohere 400000 $14.28 79.9
ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning Baidu 65536 $12.20 77.8
GPT-4.1 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $14.88 82.0
Command A Turbo Cohere 32768 $13.53 79.8

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.6 131 78th
GPQA Diamond 75.0 145 76th
SWE-bench Verified 63.9 234 61th
HumanEval 82.3 179 70th
MATH-500 79.1 231 62th
LiveCodeBench 70.2 187 69th
IFEval 83.9 215 64th
TruthfulQA 81.2 148 75th
HellaSwag 86.7 187 69th
MMMU 75.1 161 73th
Arena Elo 1398.7 211 65th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning get on AIME 2025?

ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning scores 77.2 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #127 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning cost?

ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning costs $12.20 per million input tokens and $55.24 per million output tokens.

Related