Coding · Baidu

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo scores 82.6 on HumanEval, placing it #168 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
82.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#168
of 600
Percentile
72th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
14.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with ERNIE 4.0 Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, ERNIE 4.0 Turbo sits at #168 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 14.2 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts ERNIE 4.0 Turbo above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 80.6 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is 2.0 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is 0.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 82.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $12.00 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.0 Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nemotron 4 NVIDIA 65536 $4.18 76.6
Reka Core Max Reka AI 128000 $13.41 79.3
Sonar Pro Reasoning Perplexity 128000 $13.94 80.5
Doubao 1.5 Pro ByteDance 200000 $13.65 79.7
ERNIE 4.0 Turbo Baidu 65536 $12.00 78.0
Hunyuan-Turbo Max Tencent 128000 $12.40 78.3
Sonar Pro Perplexity 128000 $13.01 79.1

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.0 Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.5 168 72th
GPQA Diamond 76.2 115 81th
SWE-bench Verified 64.7 217 64th
MATH-500 82.0 167 72th
AIME 2025 72.6 207 66th
LiveCodeBench 71.9 147 76th
IFEval 85.2 182 70th
TruthfulQA 79.0 216 64th
HellaSwag 87.0 176 71th
MMMU 76.8 115 81th
Arena Elo 1422.9 134 78th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo get on HumanEval?

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo scores 82.6 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #168 of 600 models, in the 72nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is ERNIE 4.0 Turbo good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.0 Turbo cost?

ERNIE 4.0 Turbo costs $12.00 per million input tokens and $55.04 per million output tokens.

Related