Reasoning · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Nano on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 Nano scores 60.0 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #405 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
60.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#405
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
27.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with ERNIE 4.5 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, ERNIE 4.5 Nano sits at #405 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 27.0 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts ERNIE 4.5 Nano below the midpoint.

Baidu models average 71.1 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 Nano is 11.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Baidu model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 62.9. ERNIE 4.5 Nano is 2.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 60.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $6.01 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Mini Perplexity 65536 $6.52 67.9
Phi-3.5 Base Microsoft 65536 $2.24 66.6
DeepSeek-V3.2 7B DeepSeek 4096 $1.75 63.2
Reka Flash Mini Reka AI 16384 $5.77 65.5
ERNIE 4.5 Nano Baidu 32768 $6.01 65.6
Molmo Base Allen Institute for AI 4096 $2.02 65.0
Reka Core Nano Reka AI 16384 $5.45 65.1

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 69.7 399 34th
SWE-bench Verified 56.2 375 38th
HumanEval 69.4 405 33th
MATH-500 68.1 399 34th
AIME 2025 57.8 401 33th
LiveCodeBench 55.5 400 33th
IFEval 76.8 379 37th
TruthfulQA 68.9 405 33th
HellaSwag 77.4 410 32th
MMMU 61.5 416 31th
Arena Elo 1310.0 409 32th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 Nano get on GPQA Diamond?

ERNIE 4.5 Nano scores 60.0 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does ERNIE 4.5 Nano rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #405 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is ERNIE 4.5 Nano good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 Nano cost?

ERNIE 4.5 Nano costs $6.01 per million input tokens and $22.92 per million output tokens.

Related