Coding · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Pro on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 Pro scores 86.9 on HumanEval, placing it #90 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
86.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#90
of 600
Percentile
85th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
9.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with ERNIE 4.5 Pro highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, ERNIE 4.5 Pro sits at #90 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 9.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts ERNIE 4.5 Pro above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 80.6 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 Pro is 6.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. ERNIE 4.5 Pro is 4.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 86.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.89 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 Pro is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Claude Haiku 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 200000 $14.37 80.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vision Anthropic 128000 $16.99 83.8
Gemini 2.5 Pro Max Google DeepMind 200000 $16.94 84.8
Qwen3 Alibaba Cloud 128000 $5.04 80.3
ERNIE 4.5 Pro Baidu 1000000 $13.89 80.5
Gemini 3 Flash Reasoning Google DeepMind 128000 $17.05 83.7
GPT-4.1 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $14.88 82.0

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5 Pro

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.3 175 71th
GPQA Diamond 74.7 149 75th
SWE-bench Verified 66.5 178 70th
MATH-500 87.2 75 88th
AIME 2025 76.3 136 77th
LiveCodeBench 76.4 77 87th
IFEval 86.0 156 74th
TruthfulQA 83.1 105 83th
HellaSwag 90.2 80 87th
MMMU 78.4 86 86th
Arena Elo 1414.3 171 72th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 Pro get on HumanEval?

ERNIE 4.5 Pro scores 86.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does ERNIE 4.5 Pro rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #90 of 600 models, in the 85th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is ERNIE 4.5 Pro good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 Pro cost?

ERNIE 4.5 Pro costs $13.89 per million input tokens and $65.19 per million output tokens.

Related