Multimodal · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning scores 74.4 on MMMU, placing it #171 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
74.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#171
of 600
Percentile
72th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
12.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning sits at #171 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 12.5 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 72.2 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning is 2.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning is 0.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $14.36 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
ERNIE 4.0 Pro Baidu 200000 $12.58 77.5
Grok 4 Mini xAI 65536 $12.21 77.9
Gemini 3 Pro Mini Google DeepMind 128000 $12.27 78.1
Seed-OSS Instruct ByteDance 128000 $3.79 76.0
ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning Baidu 1000000 $14.36 79.8
GLM-4.5 Base Zhipu AI 32768 $3.99 74.9
Hunyuan-Turbo Max Tencent 128000 $12.40 78.3

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 162 73th
GPQA Diamond 75.7 129 79th
SWE-bench Verified 69.8 114 81th
HumanEval 85.0 116 81th
MATH-500 82.5 154 74th
AIME 2025 78.1 114 81th
LiveCodeBench 71.9 148 75th
IFEval 88.7 88 85th
TruthfulQA 82.9 108 82th
HellaSwag 88.0 140 77th
Arena Elo 1421.5 141 77th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning get on MMMU?

ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning scores 74.4 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning rank on MMMU?

It ranks #171 of 600 models, in the 72nd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning cost?

ERNIE 4.5 Reasoning costs $14.36 per million input tokens and $78.75 per million output tokens.

Related