Coding · Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

ERNIE 4.5 scores 83.9 on HumanEval, placing it #134 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
83.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#134
of 600
Percentile
78th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
12.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with ERNIE 4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, ERNIE 4.5 sits at #134 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 12.9 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts ERNIE 4.5 above the midpoint.

Baidu models average 80.6 on this benchmark. ERNIE 4.5 is 3.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Baidu model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 82.2. ERNIE 4.5 is 1.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 83.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $13.44 per million input tokens, ERNIE 4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Nova Pro Pro Amazon 200000 $13.03 79.5
Doubao 1.5 Pro Max ByteDance 400000 $14.93 81.2
Hunyuan-Large Instruct Tencent 65536 $4.39 78.2
Kimi K1.5 Instruct Moonshot AI 200000 $5.15 80.5
ERNIE 4.5 Baidu 65536 $13.44 80.0
MiniMax-Text Chat MiniMax 128000 $4.26 77.8
Qwen3 Chat Alibaba Cloud 128000 $4.75 79.1

Other benchmarks for ERNIE 4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 83.7 86 86th
GPQA Diamond 77.2 102 83th
SWE-bench Verified 68.2 140 77th
MATH-500 81.3 181 70th
AIME 2025 75.9 142 76th
LiveCodeBench 72.9 131 78th
IFEval 86.4 146 76th
TruthfulQA 83.0 106 82th
HellaSwag 89.2 108 82th
MMMU 78.0 97 84th
Arena Elo 1414.8 168 72th

FAQ

What score does ERNIE 4.5 get on HumanEval?

ERNIE 4.5 scores 83.9 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does ERNIE 4.5 rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #134 of 600 models, in the 78th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is ERNIE 4.5 good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does ERNIE 4.5 cost?

ERNIE 4.5 costs $13.44 per million input tokens and $56.59 per million output tokens.

Related