Mathematics · Fireworks AI

Firefunction Reasoning on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Firefunction Reasoning scores 71.4 on AIME 2025, placing it #232 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
71.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#232
of 600
Percentile
61th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
20.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Firefunction Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Firefunction Reasoning sits at #232 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 20.0 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Firefunction Reasoning above the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 60.5 on this benchmark. Firefunction Reasoning is 10.9 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Firefunction Reasoning is 11.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 71.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.08 per million input tokens, Firefunction Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Flash Max Reka AI 32768 $11.17 75.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Nano Anthropic 32768 $9.38 73.3
Codestral Mistral AI 65536 $4.19 77.6
Firefunction Pro Fireworks AI 16384 $9.05 72.9
Firefunction Reasoning Fireworks AI 8192 $9.08 72.5
Seed-OSS Instruct ByteDance 128000 $3.79 76.0
MiniMax-Text MiniMax 32768 $4.44 77.0

Other benchmarks for Firefunction Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.7 359 40th
GPQA Diamond 68.2 309 49th
SWE-bench Verified 58.2 351 42th
HumanEval 77.2 306 49th
MATH-500 76.5 290 52th
LiveCodeBench 63.7 326 46th
IFEval 81.1 306 49th
TruthfulQA 77.5 268 55th
HellaSwag 83.1 316 47th
MMMU 67.3 354 41th
Arena Elo 1359.1 346 42th

FAQ

What score does Firefunction Reasoning get on AIME 2025?

Firefunction Reasoning scores 71.4 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Firefunction Reasoning rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #232 of 600 models, in the 61st percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Firefunction Reasoning good at AIME 2025?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firefunction Reasoning cost?

Firefunction Reasoning costs $9.08 per million input tokens and $42.16 per million output tokens.

Related