Mathematics · Fireworks AI

Firesearch Reasoning on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Firesearch Reasoning scores 62.8 on AIME 2025, placing it #367 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
62.8
0–100 scale
Rank
#367
of 600
Percentile
39th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
28.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Firesearch Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Firesearch Reasoning sits at #367 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 28.6 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Firesearch Reasoning below the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 60.5 on this benchmark. Firesearch Reasoning is 2.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Firesearch Reasoning is 2.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 62.8 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.74 per million input tokens, Firesearch Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
DBRX Base Databricks 32768 $2.63 69.1
Fusion Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.59 72.2
Gemini 3 Flash Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.56 69.4
OLMo 2 Chat Allen Institute for AI 16384 $2.94 70.6
Firesearch Reasoning Fireworks AI 32768 $7.74 69.0
Arctic Base Snowflake 32768 $2.27 67.5
Auto Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.39 71.5

Other benchmarks for Firesearch Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.3 381 37th
GPQA Diamond 63.1 382 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.7 378 37th
HumanEval 71.9 380 37th
MATH-500 70.9 380 37th
LiveCodeBench 63.9 321 47th
IFEval 77.3 376 37th
TruthfulQA 71.9 382 36th
HellaSwag 81.8 354 41th
MMMU 66.9 361 40th
Arena Elo 1364.8 332 45th

FAQ

What score does Firesearch Reasoning get on AIME 2025?

Firesearch Reasoning scores 62.8 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Firesearch Reasoning rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #367 of 600 models, in the 39th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Firesearch Reasoning good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firesearch Reasoning cost?

Firesearch Reasoning costs $7.74 per million input tokens and $33.47 per million output tokens.

Related