Mathematics · Fireworks AI

Firesearch Reasoning on MATH-500: score, rank and what it means

Firesearch Reasoning scores 70.9 on MATH-500, placing it #380 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Score
70.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#380
of 600
Percentile
37th
within the index
Benchmark avg
72.5
all models
Leader
96.7
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
25.8
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MATH-500, with Firesearch Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 96.7
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 95.9
GPT-5.1 Pro 95.1
o4 Reasoning 94.8
Grok 4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 94.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 94.2
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 93.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo 93.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
5 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
6 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo Anthropic 2000000 $19.57 85.7

What this score means

On MATH-500, Firesearch Reasoning sits at #380 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.7, so the gap to the top is 25.8 points. The median model in this index scores 76.0, which puts Firesearch Reasoning below the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 69.4 on this benchmark. Firesearch Reasoning is 1.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 70.0. Firesearch Reasoning is 0.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 70.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.74 per million input tokens, Firesearch Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MATH-500. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Firefunction Turbo Fireworks AI 32768 $8.44 70.7
Auto Turbo OpenRouter 65536 $7.96 70.9
Yi-Large Base 01.AI 16384 $2.78 70.3
DBRX Base Databricks 32768 $2.63 69.1
Firesearch Reasoning Fireworks AI 32768 $7.74 69.0
Mixtral Groq Base Groq 32768 $2.66 68.4
Arctic Snowflake 8192 $2.72 68.8

Other benchmarks for Firesearch Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 72.3 381 37th
GPQA Diamond 63.1 382 36th
SWE-bench Verified 55.7 378 37th
HumanEval 71.9 380 37th
AIME 2025 62.8 367 39th
LiveCodeBench 63.9 321 47th
IFEval 77.3 376 37th
TruthfulQA 71.9 382 36th
HellaSwag 81.8 354 41th
MMMU 66.9 361 40th
Arena Elo 1364.8 332 45th

FAQ

What score does Firesearch Reasoning get on MATH-500?

Firesearch Reasoning scores 70.9 on MATH-500 in this index. The benchmark average is 72.5 and the top score is 96.7.

How does Firesearch Reasoning rank on MATH-500?

It ranks #380 of 600 models, in the 37th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.7.

Is Firesearch Reasoning good at MATH-500?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MATH-500 score calculated?

MATH-500 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firesearch Reasoning cost?

Firesearch Reasoning costs $7.74 per million input tokens and $33.47 per million output tokens.

Related