Coding · Fireworks AI

Firesearch Turbo on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

Firesearch Turbo scores 62.0 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #348 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
62.0
0–100 scale
Rank
#348
of 600
Percentile
42th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
23.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with Firesearch Turbo highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, Firesearch Turbo sits at #348 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 23.1 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts Firesearch Turbo below the midpoint.

Fireworks AI models average 58.6 on this benchmark. Firesearch Turbo is 3.4 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Fireworks AI model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 58.3. Firesearch Turbo is 3.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 62.0 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.58 per million input tokens, Firesearch Turbo is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6
Gemma 3 Base Google DeepMind 65536 $3.09 71.1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Mini Anthropic 16384 $8.76 71.6
Mixtral Turbo Base Together AI 32768 $2.53 69.7
Firesearch Turbo Fireworks AI 16384 $7.58 69.3
Mixtral Base Mistral AI 65536 $2.95 71.1
Reka Core Mini Reka AI 8192 $7.48 70.1

Other benchmarks for Firesearch Turbo

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 74.2 347 42th
GPQA Diamond 64.4 372 38th
SWE-bench Verified 57.6 362 40th
HumanEval 73.6 366 39th
MATH-500 74.9 326 46th
AIME 2025 61.3 380 37th
IFEval 77.4 374 38th
TruthfulQA 72.6 374 38th
HellaSwag 79.8 380 37th
MMMU 64.0 389 35th
Arena Elo 1352.1 361 40th

FAQ

What score does Firesearch Turbo get on LiveCodeBench?

Firesearch Turbo scores 62.0 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does Firesearch Turbo rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #348 of 600 models, in the 42nd percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is Firesearch Turbo good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Firesearch Turbo cost?

Firesearch Turbo costs $7.58 per million input tokens and $33.44 per million output tokens.

Related