Coding · OpenRouter

Fusion Max on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Fusion Max scores 79.1 on HumanEval, placing it #262 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
79.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#262
of 600
Percentile
56th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
17.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Fusion Max highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Fusion Max sits at #262 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 17.7 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Fusion Max above the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 73.0 on this benchmark. Fusion Max is 6.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Fusion Max is 7.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 79.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.14 per million input tokens, Fusion Max is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Gemma 3 Chat Google DeepMind 65536 $3.74 74.5
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Base Cerebras 65536 $3.36 72.7
Llama 3.1 Turbo Instruct Together AI 32768 $4.21 76.7
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2
Fusion Max OpenRouter 65536 $9.14 72.5
Llama 3 DeepInfra DeepInfra 128000 $3.67 74.0
Yi-Lightning Instruct 01.AI 128000 $4.16 76.5

Other benchmarks for Fusion Max

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 75.1 329 45th
GPQA Diamond 71.5 229 62th
SWE-bench Verified 59.1 340 43th
MATH-500 74.1 344 43th
AIME 2025 65.1 337 44th
LiveCodeBench 63.3 334 44th
IFEval 81.4 288 52th
TruthfulQA 78.6 231 62th
HellaSwag 82.6 331 45th
MMMU 67.7 348 42th
Arena Elo 1359.7 345 43th

FAQ

What score does Fusion Max get on HumanEval?

Fusion Max scores 79.1 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Fusion Max rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #262 of 600 models, in the 56th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Fusion Max good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Fusion Max cost?

Fusion Max costs $9.14 per million input tokens and $43.52 per million output tokens.

Related