Coding · OpenRouter

Fusion Reasoning on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

Fusion Reasoning scores 78.2 on HumanEval, placing it #285 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
78.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#285
of 600
Percentile
53th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
18.6
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with Fusion Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, Fusion Reasoning sits at #285 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 18.6 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts Fusion Reasoning above the midpoint.

OpenRouter models average 73.0 on this benchmark. Fusion Reasoning is 5.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenRouter model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.5. Fusion Reasoning is 6.7 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $8.59 per million input tokens, Fusion Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
Qwen3-Coder Base Alibaba Cloud 200000 $3.99 76.6
DeepSeek-Coder Base DeepSeek 32768 $3.53 74.1
DBRX Databricks 65536 $3.29 73.3
Fusion Reasoning OpenRouter 65536 $8.59 72.2
Mixtral Instruct Mistral AI 65536 $3.35 72.9
Nova Lite Amazon 65536 $9.20 73.4

Other benchmarks for Fusion Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 73.3 365 39th
GPQA Diamond 67.4 323 46th
SWE-bench Verified 61.7 288 52th
MATH-500 73.1 356 41th
AIME 2025 63.3 364 39th
LiveCodeBench 66.6 259 57th
IFEval 82.0 278 54th
TruthfulQA 73.8 358 40th
HellaSwag 84.1 274 54th
MMMU 71.0 272 55th
Arena Elo 1357.6 348 42th

FAQ

What score does Fusion Reasoning get on HumanEval?

Fusion Reasoning scores 78.2 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does Fusion Reasoning rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #285 of 600 models, in the 53rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is Fusion Reasoning good at HumanEval?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Fusion Reasoning cost?

Fusion Reasoning costs $8.59 per million input tokens and $32.34 per million output tokens.

Related