Mathematics · Google DeepMind

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano scores 63.7 on AIME 2025, placing it #360 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
63.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#360
of 600
Percentile
40th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
27.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano sits at #360 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 27.7 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano below the midpoint.

Google DeepMind models average 74.8 on this benchmark. Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is 11.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Google DeepMind model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 60.1. Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is 3.6 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 63.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.28 per million input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Sonar Pro Mini Perplexity 8192 $8.02 70.3
Hunyuan-Turbo Mini Tencent 8192 $6.59 68.3
OLMo 2 Allen Institute for AI 65536 $2.99 71.0
Firefunction Turbo Fireworks AI 32768 $8.44 70.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Claude Haiku 4.5 Nano Anthropic 8192 $6.47 68.7
Command R+ Base Cohere 65536 $3.24 71.6

Other benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 71.4 385 36th
GPQA Diamond 65.4 353 41th
SWE-bench Verified 54.3 390 35th
HumanEval 71.1 387 36th
MATH-500 74.9 327 46th
LiveCodeBench 59.2 376 37th
IFEval 79.9 334 44th
TruthfulQA 74.4 343 43th
HellaSwag 80.7 375 38th
MMMU 65.9 374 38th
Arena Elo 1349.7 364 39th

FAQ

What score does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano get on AIME 2025?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano scores 63.7 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #360 of 600 models, in the 40th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano cost?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano costs $7.28 per million input tokens and $28.44 per million output tokens.

Related