Safety · Google DeepMind

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano scores 74.4 on TruthfulQA, placing it #343 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
74.4
0–100 scale
Rank
#343
of 600
Percentile
43th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
16.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano sits at #343 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 16.7 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano below the midpoint.

Google DeepMind models average 80.7 on this benchmark. Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is 6.3 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Google DeepMind model.

Among mid-range models, the average is 71.6. Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is 2.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $7.28 per million input tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Mixtral Turbo Chat Together AI 32768 $3.02 71.7
Fusion Turbo OpenRouter 8192 $8.55 71.7
Mixtral Groq Instruct Groq 16384 $3.25 72.5
Yi-Large Instruct 01.AI 32768 $3.48 73.4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano Google DeepMind 32768 $7.28 69.2
Llama 3 Lambda Base Lambda 8192 $3.19 72.9
OLMo 2 Chat Allen Institute for AI 16384 $2.94 70.6

Other benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 71.4 385 36th
GPQA Diamond 65.4 353 41th
SWE-bench Verified 54.3 390 35th
HumanEval 71.1 387 36th
MATH-500 74.9 327 46th
AIME 2025 63.7 360 40th
LiveCodeBench 59.2 376 37th
IFEval 79.9 334 44th
HellaSwag 80.7 375 38th
MMMU 65.9 374 38th
Arena Elo 1349.7 364 39th

FAQ

What score does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano get on TruthfulQA?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano scores 74.4 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #343 of 600 models, in the 43rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano good at TruthfulQA?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano cost?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Nano costs $7.28 per million input tokens and $28.44 per million output tokens.

Related