Reasoning · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 1.5B on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 1.5B scores 47.5 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #543 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
47.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#543
of 600
Percentile
10th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
39.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with GLM-4.5 1.5B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, GLM-4.5 1.5B sits at #543 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 39.5 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts GLM-4.5 1.5B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 65.7 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 1.5B is 18.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 49.3. GLM-4.5 1.5B is 1.8 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $0.65 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 1.5B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Arctic 8B Snowflake 8192 $0.65 52.4
Molmo 8B Allen Institute for AI 32768 $0.44 49.9
Mixtral Turbo 7B Together AI 8192 $0.68 53.2
Phi-3.5 7B Microsoft 4096 $0.50 50.5
GLM-4.5 1.5B Zhipu AI 16384 $0.65 53.3
Mixtral Groq 7B Groq 4096 $0.70 53.4
QwQ 1.5B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $0.61 51.6

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5 1.5B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 59.2 535 11th
SWE-bench Verified 38.3 535 11th
HumanEval 56.7 533 11th
MATH-500 53.4 531 12th
AIME 2025 39.4 544 9th
LiveCodeBench 43.4 512 15th
IFEval 65.4 528 12th
TruthfulQA 59.6 533 11th
HellaSwag 70.9 522 13th
MMMU 52.8 522 13th
Arena Elo 1219.9 535 11th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 1.5B get on GPQA Diamond?

GLM-4.5 1.5B scores 47.5 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does GLM-4.5 1.5B rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #543 of 600 models, in the 10th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is GLM-4.5 1.5B good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 1.5B cost?

GLM-4.5 1.5B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens.

Related