Reasoning · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 7B on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 7B scores 54.5 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #472 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
54.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#472
of 600
Percentile
21th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
32.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with GLM-4.5 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, GLM-4.5 7B sits at #472 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 32.5 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts GLM-4.5 7B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 65.7 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 7B is 11.2 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 49.3. GLM-4.5 7B is 5.2 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 54.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.32 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GPT-NeoX EleutherAI 16384 $1.57 61.7
Llama 3 Modal 8B Modal 32768 $0.98 56.6
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 8B Cerebras 32768 $1.02 58.2
MiniMax-Text 7B MiniMax 16384 $1.10 57.7
GLM-4.5 7B Zhipu AI 8192 $1.32 60.2
Seed-OSS 8B ByteDance 8192 $1.05 57.1
Llama 3.1 7B Meta AI 8192 $1.01 57.4

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.1 452 25th
SWE-bench Verified 45.4 462 23th
HumanEval 65.3 438 27th
MATH-500 63.3 433 28th
AIME 2025 51.2 448 25th
LiveCodeBench 49.4 454 24th
IFEval 70.5 448 25th
TruthfulQA 64.4 465 23th
HellaSwag 73.1 476 21th
MMMU 59.6 432 28th
Arena Elo 1258.6 477 21th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 7B get on GPQA Diamond?

GLM-4.5 7B scores 54.5 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does GLM-4.5 7B rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #472 of 600 models, in the 21st percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is GLM-4.5 7B good at GPQA Diamond?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 7B cost?

GLM-4.5 7B costs $1.32 per million input tokens and $5.93 per million output tokens.

Related