Coding · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 8B on HumanEval: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 8B scores 64.6 on HumanEval, placing it #445 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Score
64.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#445
of 600
Percentile
26th
within the index
Benchmark avg
74.0
all models
Leader
96.8
GPT-5.2 Pro
Gap to leader
32.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on HumanEval, with GLM-4.5 8B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Pro 96.8
Gemini 3 Pro Pro 95.0
o4 Max 94.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 93.8
Claude Opus 4.5 93.7
GPT-5.2 Max 93.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 93.4
Grok 4 Max 93.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 93.2
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 92.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
2 Gemini 3 Pro Pro Google DeepMind 200000 $19.80 87.3
3 o4 Max OpenAI 2000000 $19.51 86.2
4 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
5 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
8 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
9 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
10 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3

What this score means

On HumanEval, GLM-4.5 8B sits at #445 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Pro, scores 96.8, so the gap to the top is 32.2 points. The median model in this index scores 77.4, which puts GLM-4.5 8B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 74.4 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 8B is 9.8 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 56.7. GLM-4.5 8B is 7.9 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 64.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.46 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 8B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HumanEval. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Zephyr Instruct Hugging Face 4096 $1.66 62.4
GPT-NeoX EleutherAI 16384 $1.57 61.7
Zephyr Base Hugging Face 4096 $1.26 59.5
GLM-4.6 8B Zhipu AI 8192 $1.69 63.1
GLM-4.5 8B Zhipu AI 32768 $1.46 61.3
Qwen3-Coder 8B Alibaba Cloud 32768 $1.43 61.3
GPT-NeoX Base EleutherAI 16384 $1.22 59.7

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5 8B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 64.2 465 23th
GPQA Diamond 54.3 476 21th
SWE-bench Verified 48.4 434 28th
MATH-500 64.4 422 30th
AIME 2025 53.7 427 29th
LiveCodeBench 53.7 414 31th
IFEval 72.5 425 29th
TruthfulQA 67.5 424 29th
HellaSwag 73.4 470 22th
MMMU 57.3 464 23th
Arena Elo 1269.0 462 23th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 8B get on HumanEval?

GLM-4.5 8B scores 64.6 on HumanEval in this index. The benchmark average is 74.0 and the top score is 96.8.

How does GLM-4.5 8B rank on HumanEval?

It ranks #445 of 600 models, in the 26th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Pro at 96.8.

Is GLM-4.5 8B good at HumanEval?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the HumanEval score calculated?

HumanEval is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 8B cost?

GLM-4.5 8B costs $1.46 per million input tokens and $6.70 per million output tokens.

Related