Reasoning · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 Chat on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 Chat scores 74.3 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #159 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
74.3
0–100 scale
Rank
#159
of 600
Percentile
74th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
12.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with GLM-4.5 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, GLM-4.5 Chat sits at #159 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 12.7 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts GLM-4.5 Chat above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 65.7 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 Chat is 8.6 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. GLM-4.5 Chat is 0.8 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.3 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.53 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Kimi K1.5 Moonshot AI 128000 $5.19 80.7
Llama 3.1 Cerebras Cerebras 128000 $4.01 76.0
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Nemotron 4 NVIDIA 65536 $4.18 76.6
GLM-4.5 Chat Zhipu AI 65536 $4.53 78.3
Kimi K1.5 Base Moonshot AI 65536 $4.34 77.4
Command A Cohere 200000 $13.30 79.6

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 81.7 130 78th
SWE-bench Verified 69.6 121 80th
HumanEval 83.8 137 77th
MATH-500 82.8 149 75th
AIME 2025 70.7 243 60th
LiveCodeBench 68.9 209 65th
IFEval 84.5 201 67th
TruthfulQA 81.6 139 77th
HellaSwag 88.1 138 77th
MMMU 75.6 148 75th
Arena Elo 1418.6 155 74th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 Chat get on GPQA Diamond?

GLM-4.5 Chat scores 74.3 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does GLM-4.5 Chat rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #159 of 600 models, in the 74th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is GLM-4.5 Chat good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 Chat cost?

GLM-4.5 Chat costs $4.53 per million input tokens and $21.22 per million output tokens.

Related