Reasoning · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5 on GPQA Diamond: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.5 scores 74.9 on GPQA Diamond, placing it #147 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Score
74.9
0–100 scale
Rank
#147
of 600
Percentile
76th
within the index
Benchmark avg
65.6
all models
Leader
87.0
GPT-5.2 Reasoning
Gap to leader
12.1
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on GPQA Diamond, with GLM-4.5 highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Reasoning 87.0
GPT-5.1 Max 86.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 86.0
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 85.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.2 84.9
o4 Turbo 84.8
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 84.6
Grok 4 Turbo 84.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
2 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
4 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
6 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
7 o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
9 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $19.90 87.2

What this score means

On GPQA Diamond, GLM-4.5 sits at #147 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Reasoning, scores 87.0, so the gap to the top is 12.1 points. The median model in this index scores 68.8, which puts GLM-4.5 above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 65.7 on this benchmark. GLM-4.5 is 9.2 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 73.5. GLM-4.5 is 1.4 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 74.9 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.55 per million input tokens, GLM-4.5 is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on GPQA Diamond. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Reka Core Max Reka AI 128000 $13.41 79.3
Reka Core Turbo Reka AI 32768 $12.58 78.4
ERNIE 4.0 Reasoning Baidu 65536 $12.20 77.8
Hunyuan-Large Tencent 65536 $4.33 78.2
GLM-4.5 Zhipu AI 200000 $4.55 78.2
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4
ERNIE 4.5 Pro Baidu 1000000 $13.89 80.5

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.5

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 78.8 215 64th
SWE-bench Verified 66.4 181 70th
HumanEval 81.6 193 68th
MATH-500 81.7 170 72th
AIME 2025 76.0 141 77th
LiveCodeBench 73.0 127 79th
IFEval 85.8 164 73th
TruthfulQA 79.7 193 68th
HellaSwag 88.8 117 81th
MMMU 73.9 194 68th
Arena Elo 1414.6 169 72th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.5 get on GPQA Diamond?

GLM-4.5 scores 74.9 on GPQA Diamond in this index. The benchmark average is 65.6 and the top score is 87.0.

How does GLM-4.5 rank on GPQA Diamond?

It ranks #147 of 600 models, in the 76th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Reasoning at 87.0.

Is GLM-4.5 good at GPQA Diamond?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the GPQA Diamond score calculated?

GPQA Diamond is a reasoning benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.5 cost?

GLM-4.5 costs $4.55 per million input tokens and $20.60 per million output tokens.

Related