Mathematics · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 7B on AIME 2025: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 7B scores 55.7 on AIME 2025, placing it #412 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Score
55.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#412
of 600
Percentile
31th
within the index
Benchmark avg
63.6
all models
Leader
91.4
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro
Gap to leader
35.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on AIME 2025, with GLM-4.6 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 91.4
GPT-5.2 Pro 91.0
GPT-5.1 Pro 90.6
GPT-5.2 90.6
o4 Reasoning 90.3
o4 Pro 89.9
Claude Opus 4.5 89.8
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Max 89.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 88.9

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
2 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
3 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
4 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
5 o4 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $19.69 87.5
6 o4 Pro OpenAI 1000000 $19.37 87.3
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
8 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
10 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2

What this score means

On AIME 2025, GLM-4.6 7B sits at #412 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Pro, scores 91.4, so the gap to the top is 35.7 points. The median model in this index scores 67.6, which puts GLM-4.6 7B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 63.8 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 7B is 8.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 41.6. GLM-4.6 7B is 14.1 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 55.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.52 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on AIME 2025. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
StableLM 2 Stability AI 8192 $1.91 65.0
DeepSeek-V3.2 8B DeepSeek 32768 $2.02 66.2
StableLM 2 Base Stability AI 8192 $1.49 61.9
GPT-NeoX EleutherAI 16384 $1.57 61.7
GLM-4.6 7B Zhipu AI 16384 $1.52 61.8
GLM-4.6 8B Zhipu AI 8192 $1.69 63.1
Kimi K2 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.86 64.7

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.6 443 26th
GPQA Diamond 58.0 427 29th
SWE-bench Verified 49.5 425 29th
HumanEval 66.6 424 29th
MATH-500 65.4 416 31th
LiveCodeBench 47.2 473 21th
IFEval 73.1 415 31th
TruthfulQA 65.6 451 25th
HellaSwag 75.4 434 28th
MMMU 58.2 456 24th
Arena Elo 1276.4 451 25th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 7B get on AIME 2025?

GLM-4.6 7B scores 55.7 on AIME 2025 in this index. The benchmark average is 63.6 and the top score is 91.4.

How does GLM-4.6 7B rank on AIME 2025?

It ranks #412 of 600 models, in the 31st percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Pro at 91.4.

Is GLM-4.6 7B good at AIME 2025?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the AIME 2025 score calculated?

AIME 2025 is a mathematics benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 7B cost?

GLM-4.6 7B costs $1.52 per million input tokens and $6.98 per million output tokens.

Related