Coding · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 7B on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 7B scores 47.2 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #473 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
47.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#473
of 600
Percentile
21th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
37.9
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with GLM-4.6 7B highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, GLM-4.6 7B sits at #473 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 37.9 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts GLM-4.6 7B below the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 61.8 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 7B is 14.6 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among small open-weight models, the average is 41.2. GLM-4.6 7B is 6.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 47.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.52 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 7B is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.3 Groq 8B Groq 16384 $1.17 59.5
MiniMax-Text 7B MiniMax 16384 $1.10 57.7
Llama 3 DeepInfra 8B DeepInfra 8192 $1.05 57.4
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 7B Cerebras 32768 $0.95 56.5
GLM-4.6 7B Zhipu AI 16384 $1.52 61.8
Llama 3.3 7B Meta AI 8192 $1.18 57.8
Llama 3.1 Cerebras 8B Cerebras 32768 $1.02 58.2

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 7B

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 65.6 443 26th
GPQA Diamond 58.0 427 29th
SWE-bench Verified 49.5 425 29th
HumanEval 66.6 424 29th
MATH-500 65.4 416 31th
AIME 2025 55.7 412 31th
IFEval 73.1 415 31th
TruthfulQA 65.6 451 25th
HellaSwag 75.4 434 28th
MMMU 58.2 456 24th
Arena Elo 1276.4 451 25th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 7B get on LiveCodeBench?

GLM-4.6 7B scores 47.2 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does GLM-4.6 7B rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #473 of 600 models, in the 21st percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is GLM-4.6 7B good at LiveCodeBench?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 7B cost?

GLM-4.6 7B costs $1.52 per million input tokens and $6.98 per million output tokens.

Related