Multimodal · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Base on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 Base scores 73.2 on MMMU, placing it #211 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
73.2
0–100 scale
Rank
#211
of 600
Percentile
65th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
13.7
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with GLM-4.6 Base highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, GLM-4.6 Base sits at #211 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 13.7 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts GLM-4.6 Base above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 67.5 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 Base is 5.7 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 74.3. GLM-4.6 Base is 1.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 73.2 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.53 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 Base is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Qwen3-Coder Base Alibaba Cloud 200000 $3.99 76.6
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4
MiniMax-M2 Base MiniMax 65536 $4.20 76.4
GLM-4.6 Base Zhipu AI 128000 $4.53 78.5
Hunyuan-Turbo Pro Tencent 65536 $12.00 77.6
Nova Lite Pro Amazon 200000 $9.69 74.1

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 Base

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 79.5 194 68th
GPQA Diamond 75.1 141 77th
SWE-bench Verified 66.0 192 68th
HumanEval 83.8 139 77th
MATH-500 83.8 127 79th
AIME 2025 71.8 222 63th
LiveCodeBench 74.5 99 84th
IFEval 86.9 134 78th
TruthfulQA 81.9 131 78th
HellaSwag 86.6 190 68th
Arena Elo 1421.8 140 77th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 Base get on MMMU?

GLM-4.6 Base scores 73.2 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does GLM-4.6 Base rank on MMMU?

It ranks #211 of 600 models, in the 65th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is GLM-4.6 Base good at MMMU?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 Base cost?

GLM-4.6 Base costs $4.53 per million input tokens and $20.43 per million output tokens.

Related