Coding · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Chat on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 Chat scores 69.6 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #200 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
69.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#200
of 600
Percentile
67th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
15.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with GLM-4.6 Chat highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, GLM-4.6 Chat sits at #200 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 15.5 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts GLM-4.6 Chat above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 61.8 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 Chat is 7.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 70.3. GLM-4.6 Chat is 0.7 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 69.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $4.89 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 Chat is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Qwen3-Coder Alibaba Cloud 200000 $4.94 79.5
Llama 3.3 Chat Meta AI 32768 $4.18 76.9
Magistral Base Mistral AI 65536 $3.86 75.6
DeepSeek-Coder Chat DeepSeek 200000 $4.20 77.3
GLM-4.6 Chat Zhipu AI 400000 $4.89 79.8
Reka Flash Pro Reka AI 200000 $10.82 75.2
Reka Core Reka AI 32768 $12.17 77.4

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 Chat

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 82.2 117 81th
GPQA Diamond 72.8 201 67th
SWE-bench Verified 66.0 193 68th
HumanEval 86.3 99 84th
MATH-500 86.8 81 87th
AIME 2025 79.2 99 84th
IFEval 87.8 108 82th
TruthfulQA 83.2 103 83th
HellaSwag 89.9 87 86th
MMMU 73.5 203 66th
Arena Elo 1437.7 103 83th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 Chat get on LiveCodeBench?

GLM-4.6 Chat scores 69.6 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does GLM-4.6 Chat rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #200 of 600 models, in the 67th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is GLM-4.6 Chat good at LiveCodeBench?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 Chat cost?

GLM-4.6 Chat costs $4.89 per million input tokens and $21.46 per million output tokens.

Related