Preference · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Instruct on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 Instruct scores 1426.6 on Arena Elo, placing it #126 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1426.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#126
of 600
Percentile
79th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
75.3
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with GLM-4.6 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, GLM-4.6 Instruct sits at #126 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 75.3 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts GLM-4.6 Instruct above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 1352.5 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 Instruct is 74.1 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 1409.6. GLM-4.6 Instruct is 17.0 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1426.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.15 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Llama 4 Scout Instruct Meta AI 32768 $4.59 79.1
MiniMax-Text Instruct MiniMax 128000 $4.59 77.7
Doubao 1.5 Pro ByteDance 200000 $13.65 79.7
Magistral Mistral AI 200000 $4.75 79.8
GLM-4.6 Instruct Zhipu AI 1000000 $5.15 80.4
Reka Core Turbo Reka AI 32768 $12.58 78.4
Nova Pro Amazon 32768 $12.75 79.4

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 163 73th
GPQA Diamond 75.8 124 79th
SWE-bench Verified 70.5 100 83th
HumanEval 85.3 108 82th
MATH-500 84.9 110 82th
AIME 2025 74.5 164 73th
LiveCodeBench 72.6 134 78th
IFEval 87.4 121 80th
TruthfulQA 83.8 85 86th
HellaSwag 90.6 72 88th
MMMU 78.9 74 88th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 Instruct get on Arena Elo?

GLM-4.6 Instruct scores 1426.6 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does GLM-4.6 Instruct rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #126 of 600 models, in the 79th percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is GLM-4.6 Instruct good at Arena Elo?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 Instruct cost?

GLM-4.6 Instruct costs $5.15 per million input tokens and $24.32 per million output tokens.

Related