Coding · Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6 Instruct on LiveCodeBench: score, rank and what it means

GLM-4.6 Instruct scores 72.6 on LiveCodeBench, placing it #134 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Score
72.6
0–100 scale
Rank
#134
of 600
Percentile
78th
within the index
Benchmark avg
61.0
all models
Leader
85.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Gap to leader
12.5
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on LiveCodeBench, with GLM-4.6 Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.1
Grok 4 Reasoning 85.1
Claude Opus 4.5 85.0
GPT-5.2 Max 84.8
Grok 4 Turbo 84.7
GPT-5.1 Turbo 84.6
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.6
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro 84.1
Gemini 3 Pro Max 83.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
2 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
3 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
4 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
5 Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
6 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1
7 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
8 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
9 Claude Opus 4.5 Pro Anthropic 200000 $20.98 89.1
10 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9

What this score means

On LiveCodeBench, GLM-4.6 Instruct sits at #134 of 600. The leader, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning, scores 85.1, so the gap to the top is 12.5 points. The median model in this index scores 64.7, which puts GLM-4.6 Instruct above the midpoint.

Zhipu AI models average 61.8 on this benchmark. GLM-4.6 Instruct is 10.8 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average Zhipu AI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 70.3. GLM-4.6 Instruct is 2.3 points above that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 72.6 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $5.15 per million input tokens, GLM-4.6 Instruct is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on LiveCodeBench. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Command A Turbo Cohere 32768 $13.53 79.8
ERNIE 4.5 Baidu 65536 $13.44 80.0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Mini Anthropic 32768 $11.43 76.5
Sonar Max Perplexity 32768 $11.60 77.8
GLM-4.6 Instruct Zhipu AI 1000000 $5.15 80.4
Hunyuan-Turbo Pro Tencent 65536 $12.00 77.6
Claude Opus 4.5 Mini Anthropic 65536 $12.72 79.0

Other benchmarks for GLM-4.6 Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 80.6 163 73th
GPQA Diamond 75.8 124 79th
SWE-bench Verified 70.5 100 83th
HumanEval 85.3 108 82th
MATH-500 84.9 110 82th
AIME 2025 74.5 164 73th
IFEval 87.4 121 80th
TruthfulQA 83.8 85 86th
HellaSwag 90.6 72 88th
MMMU 78.9 74 88th
Arena Elo 1426.6 126 79th

FAQ

What score does GLM-4.6 Instruct get on LiveCodeBench?

GLM-4.6 Instruct scores 72.6 on LiveCodeBench in this index. The benchmark average is 61.0 and the top score is 85.1.

How does GLM-4.6 Instruct rank on LiveCodeBench?

It ranks #134 of 600 models, in the 78th percentile. The leader is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning at 85.1.

Is GLM-4.6 Instruct good at LiveCodeBench?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the LiveCodeBench score calculated?

LiveCodeBench is a coding benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GLM-4.6 Instruct cost?

GLM-4.6 Instruct costs $5.15 per million input tokens and $24.32 per million output tokens.

Related