Preference · OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Reasoning on Arena Elo: score, rank and what it means

GPT-4.1 Reasoning scores 1466.7 on Arena Elo, placing it #41 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Score
1466.7
0–100 scale
Rank
#41
of 600
Percentile
93th
within the index
Benchmark avg
1349.9
all models
Leader
1501.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Max
Gap to leader
35.2
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on Arena Elo, with GPT-4.1 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

Claude Opus 4.5 Max 1501.9
GPT-5.2 Reasoning 1500.4
GPT-5.2 Turbo 1500.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 1497.5
GPT-5.2 Max 1495.3
Gemini 3 Pro Turbo 1494.9
Grok 4 Max 1491.4
Claude Opus 4.5 1491.2
GPT-5.1 Pro 1490.0
Grok 4 Reasoning 1487.6

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 Claude Opus 4.5 Max Anthropic 1000000 $20.90 87.8
2 GPT-5.2 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $20.98 87.5
3 GPT-5.2 Turbo OpenAI 1000000 $20.73 87.4
4 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
5 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
6 Gemini 3 Pro Turbo Google DeepMind 400000 $19.62 86.4
7 Grok 4 Max xAI 2000000 $19.70 86.6
8 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic 400000 $19.42 87.7
9 GPT-5.1 Pro OpenAI 200000 $19.77 87.8
10 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8

What this score means

On Arena Elo, GPT-4.1 Reasoning sits at #41 of 600. The leader, Claude Opus 4.5 Max, scores 1501.9, so the gap to the top is 35.2 points. The median model in this index scores 1373.8, which puts GPT-4.1 Reasoning above the midpoint.

OpenAI models average 1449.4 on this benchmark. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is 17.3 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average OpenAI model.

Among frontier models, the average is 1469.8. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is 3.1 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 1466.7 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $16.97 per million input tokens, GPT-4.1 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on Arena Elo. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
o4 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.34 86.6
Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
GPT-4.1 Max OpenAI 400000 $17.34 84.7
Grok 4 Turbo xAI 1000000 $19.21 86.7
GPT-4.1 Reasoning OpenAI 1000000 $16.97 83.8
Qwen3-Max Pro Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.87 86.2
o3 Max OpenAI 2000000 $17.82 84.8

Other benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Reasoning

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 87.3 27 96th
GPQA Diamond 77.8 90 85th
SWE-bench Verified 73.1 63 90th
HumanEval 88.8 60 90th
MATH-500 89.1 57 91th
AIME 2025 82.1 64 89th
LiveCodeBench 80.5 39 94th
IFEval 91.6 42 93th
TruthfulQA 84.3 79 87th
HellaSwag 89.4 103 83th
MMMU 77.5 105 83th

FAQ

What score does GPT-4.1 Reasoning get on Arena Elo?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning scores 1466.7 on Arena Elo in this index. The benchmark average is 1349.9 and the top score is 1501.9.

How does GPT-4.1 Reasoning rank on Arena Elo?

It ranks #41 of 600 models, in the 93rd percentile. The leader is Claude Opus 4.5 Max at 1501.9.

Is GPT-4.1 Reasoning good at Arena Elo?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the Arena Elo score calculated?

Arena Elo is a preference benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GPT-4.1 Reasoning cost?

GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens.

Related