GPT-4.1 Reasoning on HellaSwag: score, rank and what it means
GPT-4.1 Reasoning scores 89.4 on HellaSwag, placing it #103 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.
Score distribution
The chart shows the top 10 models on HellaSwag, with GPT-4.1 Reasoning highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.
Top 10 leaderboard
| # | Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 1000000 | $21.39 | 89.2 |
| 2 | GPT-5.2 Turbo | OpenAI | 1000000 | $20.73 | 87.4 |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 2000000 | $21.32 | 89.6 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 200000 | $20.98 | 89.1 |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 400000 | $19.48 | 87.7 |
| 6 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 2000000 | $19.67 | 87.8 |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 Vision | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.03 | 87.4 |
| 8 | Gemini 3 Pro Turbo | Google DeepMind | 400000 | $19.62 | 86.4 |
| 9 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 400000 | $20.27 | 88.3 |
| 10 | o4 Pro | OpenAI | 1000000 | $19.37 | 87.3 |
What this score means
On HellaSwag, GPT-4.1 Reasoning sits at #103 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 96.1, so the gap to the top is 6.7 points. The median model in this index scores 83.6, which puts GPT-4.1 Reasoning above the midpoint.
OpenAI models average 90.5 on this benchmark. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is 1.1 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average OpenAI model.
Among frontier models, the average is 92.3. GPT-4.1 Reasoning is 2.9 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.
Read a 89.4 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.
Price context
At $16.97 per million input tokens, GPT-4.1 Reasoning is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on HellaSwag. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.
| Model | Provider | Context | Input / 1M | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Flash Turbo | Google DeepMind | 200000 | $17.07 | 84.1 |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision | Anthropic | 400000 | $13.96 | 81.0 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vision | Anthropic | 128000 | $16.99 | 83.8 |
| GLM-4.6 | Zhipu AI | 128000 | $5.10 | 80.2 |
| GPT-4.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 1000000 | $16.97 | 83.8 |
| Qwen3-Coder Instruct | Alibaba Cloud | 128000 | $4.66 | 78.1 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 1000000 | $15.07 | 80.8 |
Other benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Percentile | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3 | 27 | 96th | |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.8 | 90 | 85th | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.1 | 63 | 90th | |
| HumanEval | 88.8 | 60 | 90th | |
| MATH-500 | 89.1 | 57 | 91th | |
| AIME 2025 | 82.1 | 64 | 89th | |
| LiveCodeBench | 80.5 | 39 | 94th | |
| IFEval | 91.6 | 42 | 93th | |
| TruthfulQA | 84.3 | 79 | 87th | |
| MMMU | 77.5 | 105 | 83th | |
| Arena Elo | 1466.7 | 41 | 93th |
FAQ
What score does GPT-4.1 Reasoning get on HellaSwag?
GPT-4.1 Reasoning scores 89.4 on HellaSwag in this index. The benchmark average is 81.4 and the top score is 96.1.
How does GPT-4.1 Reasoning rank on HellaSwag?
It ranks #103 of 600 models, in the 83rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 96.1.
Is GPT-4.1 Reasoning good at HellaSwag?
Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.
How is the HellaSwag score calculated?
HellaSwag is a commonsense benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.
What does GPT-4.1 Reasoning cost?
GPT-4.1 Reasoning costs $16.97 per million input tokens and $82.05 per million output tokens.