Safety · OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Nano on TruthfulQA: score, rank and what it means

GPT-5.1 Nano scores 78.1 on TruthfulQA, placing it #253 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Score
78.1
0–100 scale
Rank
#253
of 600
Percentile
58th
within the index
Benchmark avg
73.6
all models
Leader
91.1
GPT-5.1 Max
Gap to leader
13.0
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on TruthfulQA, with GPT-5.1 Nano highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.1 Max 91.1
Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning 90.3
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 90.0
GPT-5.2 Pro 90.0
GPT-5.2 89.7
Gemini 3 Pro Max 89.6
Grok 4 Reasoning 89.4
Qwen3-Max Max 89.3
GPT-5.1 89.2
GPT-5.1 Turbo 89.2

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
2 Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning Google DeepMind 200000 $19.69 87.5
3 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
4 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
5 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
6 Gemini 3 Pro Max Google DeepMind 2000000 $20.57 87.9
7 Grok 4 Reasoning xAI 2000000 $19.67 87.8
8 Qwen3-Max Max Alibaba Cloud 400000 $18.53 85.9
9 GPT-5.1 OpenAI 2000000 $19.01 86.0
10 GPT-5.1 Turbo OpenAI 2000000 $19.19 86.1

What this score means

On TruthfulQA, GPT-5.1 Nano sits at #253 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.1 Max, scores 91.1, so the gap to the top is 13.0 points. The median model in this index scores 76.3, which puts GPT-5.1 Nano above the midpoint.

OpenAI models average 85.0 on this benchmark. GPT-5.1 Nano is 6.9 points below that provider line, so it is a weaker result than the average OpenAI model.

Among multimodal models, the average is 80.1. GPT-5.1 Nano is 2.0 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 78.1 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $9.56 per million input tokens, GPT-5.1 Nano is above the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on TruthfulQA. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
GPT-5.2 Nano OpenAI 128000 $9.73 73.5
Llama 3 DeepInfra DeepInfra 128000 $3.67 74.0
Phi-4 Instruct Microsoft 128000 $3.79 75.3
Claude Opus 4.5 Nano Anthropic 32768 $9.38 73.3
GPT-5.1 Nano OpenAI 32768 $9.56 74.1
Sonar Reasoning Perplexity 200000 $11.48 76.2
Yi-Large 01.AI 32768 $3.40 73.5

Other benchmarks for GPT-5.1 Nano

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 77.0 278 54th
GPQA Diamond 71.2 235 61th
SWE-bench Verified 63.1 251 58th
HumanEval 76.1 328 45th
MATH-500 79.5 220 63th
AIME 2025 66.1 328 45th
LiveCodeBench 63.9 323 46th
IFEval 82.6 257 57th
HellaSwag 85.5 227 62th
MMMU 72.0 243 60th
Arena Elo 1378.2 280 53th

FAQ

What score does GPT-5.1 Nano get on TruthfulQA?

GPT-5.1 Nano scores 78.1 on TruthfulQA in this index. The benchmark average is 73.6 and the top score is 91.1.

How does GPT-5.1 Nano rank on TruthfulQA?

It ranks #253 of 600 models, in the 58th percentile. The leader is GPT-5.1 Max at 91.1.

Is GPT-5.1 Nano good at TruthfulQA?

Yes, relative to the index: it is above the median and inside the top half of scores. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the TruthfulQA score calculated?

TruthfulQA is a safety benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GPT-5.1 Nano cost?

GPT-5.1 Nano costs $9.56 per million input tokens and $43.06 per million output tokens.

Related