Multimodal · EleutherAI

GPT-NeoX Instruct on MMMU: score, rank and what it means

GPT-NeoX Instruct scores 62.5 on MMMU, placing it #404 of 600 models in the index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Score
62.5
0–100 scale
Rank
#404
of 600
Percentile
33th
within the index
Benchmark avg
67.1
all models
Leader
86.9
GPT-5.2 Max
Gap to leader
24.4
points

Score distribution

The chart shows the top 10 models on MMMU, with GPT-NeoX Instruct highlighted. Longer bars mean higher scores.

GPT-5.2 Max 86.9
GPT-5.1 Reasoning 86.2
GPT-5.2 85.3
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning 85.2
GPT-5.1 Max 85.1
Grok 4 Pro 84.9
Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning 84.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro 84.5
GPT-5.2 Pro 84.4
GPT-5.2 Vision 84.4

Top 10 leaderboard

#ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
1 GPT-5.2 Max OpenAI 1000000 $21.39 89.2
2 GPT-5.1 Reasoning OpenAI 400000 $20.27 88.3
3 GPT-5.2 OpenAI 2000000 $19.71 88.0
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 400000 $19.48 87.7
5 GPT-5.1 Max OpenAI 2000000 $20.50 87.9
6 Grok 4 Pro xAI 1000000 $19.00 85.4
7 Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning Anthropic 2000000 $20.91 88.2
8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro Anthropic 1000000 $18.73 86.7
9 GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI 2000000 $21.32 89.6
10 GPT-5.2 Vision OpenAI 1000000 $19.03 87.4

What this score means

On MMMU, GPT-NeoX Instruct sits at #404 of 600. The leader, GPT-5.2 Max, scores 86.9, so the gap to the top is 24.4 points. The median model in this index scores 70.0, which puts GPT-NeoX Instruct below the midpoint.

EleutherAI models average 50.0 on this benchmark. GPT-NeoX Instruct is 12.5 points above that provider line, so it is a stronger result than the average EleutherAI model.

Among open-weight models, the average is 65.1. GPT-NeoX Instruct is 2.6 points below that group. This is the more useful comparison if you are shortlisting within the same tier rather than across the whole index.

Read a 62.5 as a relative signal, not an absolute guarantee. Benchmark scores depend on prompt format, evaluation harness and contamination controls. Use this page to narrow the shortlist, then test the model on your own data.

Price context

At $1.52 per million input tokens, GPT-NeoX Instruct is below the median input price of $4.00 across the 600 models scored on MMMU. The models immediately around it in the ranking are shown below so you can compare score and price together.

ModelProviderContextInput / 1MAvg score
Embed 4 Reasoning Cohere 4096 $5.50 65.3
GLM-4.6 8B Zhipu AI 8192 $1.69 63.1
DeepSeek-R1 8B DeepSeek 16384 $1.87 64.3
Llama 4 Maverick 8B Meta AI 4096 $1.64 63.4
GPT-NeoX Instruct EleutherAI 16384 $1.52 62.6
Molmo Base Allen Institute for AI 4096 $2.02 65.0
Kimi K2 8B Moonshot AI 8192 $1.86 64.7

Other benchmarks for GPT-NeoX Instruct

BenchmarkScoreRankPercentileRelative
MMLU-Pro 67.9 420 30th
GPQA Diamond 58.5 420 30th
SWE-bench Verified 50.5 418 30th
HumanEval 63.7 452 25th
MATH-500 64.9 419 30th
AIME 2025 54.1 423 30th
LiveCodeBench 53.9 412 31th
IFEval 71.2 439 27th
TruthfulQA 66.0 444 26th
HellaSwag 75.4 435 28th
Arena Elo 1292.6 429 29th

FAQ

What score does GPT-NeoX Instruct get on MMMU?

GPT-NeoX Instruct scores 62.5 on MMMU in this index. The benchmark average is 67.1 and the top score is 86.9.

How does GPT-NeoX Instruct rank on MMMU?

It ranks #404 of 600 models, in the 33rd percentile. The leader is GPT-5.2 Max at 86.9.

Is GPT-NeoX Instruct good at MMMU?

It is below the median for this benchmark, so test it carefully before relying on it for this capability. The result should be read alongside its price and context window.

How is the MMMU score calculated?

MMMU is a multimodal benchmark. Scores in this index are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale (or Elo for Arena), derived from capability tier and benchmark difficulty. They are not official leaderboard results.

What does GPT-NeoX Instruct cost?

GPT-NeoX Instruct costs $1.52 per million input tokens and $5.60 per million output tokens.

Related